EDWARD J. EPSTEIN'S THE ASSASSINATION DIARY BY JOHN CHUCKMAN
I've not read this volume, but I read all of the books
involved in making the diary.
Epstein is one of the more dishonest writers on the Kennedy
assassination, using a terrible old technique of granting critics of the Warren
Report some of their due in his first volume, thereby gaining credibility to
forge ahead in his second and third volumes to assert the Warren Commission got
it right in all the details that matter.
No one who has seriously studied the assassination - no one
independent of certain interests and connections, that is - can possibly agree
with Epstein' s so-called analysis..
His approach quite likely has something to do with the CIA
connections we can infer from the publications for which he has written, all
part of the CIA's "great Wurlitzer" whose keys are fingered to get
"the message" out there, and the nature of what he has written.
Considering the books this diary served, it cannot possibly
be worth reading.
